Warning: getdate() [function.getdate]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 155

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 156

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: date() [function.date]: It is not safe to rely on the system's timezone settings. You are *required* to use the date.timezone setting or the date_default_timezone_set() function. In case you used any of those methods and you are still getting this warning, you most likely misspelled the timezone identifier. We selected 'UTC' for 'GMT/0.0/no DST' instead in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 198

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php:155) in /home/notgoo73/public_html/rss.php on line 220
<![CDATA[Not Good Enough - Australia's Customer Complaints Website: Latest posts in forum(s) (Credit Reporting Agencies)]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/index.php Opticon RSS Feeds Consumer website www.NotGoodEnough.org en-au Mon, 04 Apr 2016 07:46:44 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Secretive Creditworthiness Checking By Finance Companies]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=40192 JimTheGeordie Tue, 31 May 2011 02:59:28 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Insensitive / non understanding / Poor customer service]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=39732 mark3480 Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:50:15 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Credit Default Successfully Deleted!]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=39687 Degga Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:24:14 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 computerflyer Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:13:28 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 petainnt Wed, 02 Feb 2011 12:37:23 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 computerflyer Sun, 30 Jan 2011 19:23:23 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 Danny_b Sun, 30 Jan 2011 09:47:50 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 petainnt Sat, 29 Jan 2011 13:45:11 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 we r law Thu, 27 Jan 2011 08:04:04 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> :) Perhaps the law should be ammended, for these civil debts the burden of proof the creditor (banks,debt collection co.s etc) have to prove is on the balance of probabilities - perhaps this should be changed to the same as criminal that being beyond a reasonable doubt. Seems too many debt companies, telco's etc can easily stuff up your credit rating with little or no credible evidence & then it takes years for you to clean up there mess & you get absolutely nothing back, not even a sorry... You should be compensated for their mistakes. Personally it cost me several hundred $$$ to run about, back & forth to Brisbane for court cases and I got none of that expense reimbursed as there is no legal requirement for them to pay...]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 Thing Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:59:41 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 Danny_b Thu, 20 Jan 2011 11:00:15 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 computerflyer Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:49:38 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 Danny_b Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:58:12 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 davmor Thu, 18 Nov 2010 04:04:42 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 G00GS Sun, 28 Mar 2010 06:02:09 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> Its an sms service, its not a mobile phone but a computer connected to a sms service (small message service) It wont answer you if you call it and it wont appear to be connected because technically its not. Actually that is not always the case. Virgin sends me SMS offers that I can respond to by pressing call, and their computer routes it to their call centre if it is their friendly sales team, or to voicemail if it is a voicemail notification. Bottom line is that it is possible to embed a return call number in an SMS. > Now if you are innocent of such things, calling them and giving your details (especially the reference number that WAS in the sms) and verifying yourself to them will get it straightened out in that first phone call with the minimum of fuss. For those of us with some degree of worry about identity theft, if you call me I will not give you my details beyond what you gave me (i.e. a reference number). If you don't know my details to start a dialogue I will not assume you are a bona fide caller until I check you out through a third party or independent method. Although many companies expect one to do that to prove who you are, I want them to prove who they are first. If I ring you with an offer and ask all your details including credit card would you be happy to oblige to order without knowing if I am a scammer or a real sales person working for a real company? I hope not! These are similar issues. Bottom line, there needs to be a two-way handshake to establish a secure exchange of information, not blind faith the call is from D&B, as an example. :-k]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 computerflyer Sun, 28 Mar 2010 02:52:36 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 G00GS Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:51:11 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 yepp Sat, 27 Mar 2010 22:16:31 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 alassinsane Sat, 27 Mar 2010 08:57:42 GMT <![CDATA[Credit Reporting Agencies - Dun and Bradstreet - Unethical Practices?]]> http://www.notgoodenough.org:/viewtopic.php?f=108&t=38037 kadee Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:55:33 GMT